• Author
    • #19254
      Profile photo of Andrew Normand

      Tools -> Resources lists as “Resources” what are called “Tags” when posting comments to threads.  Are they the same thing?

      Also, I like that there are standard tags for people to choose, but this particular list of 20 seem arbitrary?  Ordering them would be good, but beyond that could they be improved on…?

      For instance, there’s no “space”/”astonomy”/”cosmology” (whatever!), but there’s “supports discussion”?  “Software tool” or just “Software”?  Where’s “Hardware”?  “Review”?  “Recommendation”?  “Video”?  “Time critical”?

      Again, default tags should increase useability — so need to be ones that people would use to search by.  Perhaps others could contribute (below) their ideas for a list of tags so that the list could evolve?

      I think that 20 is about right, unless they can be formatted and listed under sub-headings.  Is this possible?

      1341656356birmingham update programme.pdf

      1341829898visualing the invisible – cristina lazzeroni.pdf

      1341830109more hands-on particle physics – lynne long.pdf

      1341830139discoverthecosmos – lynne long.pdf

      1341830156uob cloud chamber – lynne long.pdf

      1341830218cloud chambers – richard bonella.pdf

      1341830239problem solving handout – martin freer.pdf

      1341830389things to do with dry ice – richard bonella.pdf

      13419091402012 games presentation – nicky thomas final.pptx

      13418306742012 games activities – nicky thomas.docx

      1341831696electrical conduction – jim woodfin.pdf

      1341910290hot and cold – lynne long.pptx

    • #19267
      Profile photo of Andrew Normand

      The whole area of tagging and searching is one we are likely to overhaul, if we identify future funding. Bluntly, this is a mess – the original Elgg tagging system broke down when we customised it to create an object called a “resource”.

      If you’d like a more extensive answer, read on…

      We felt teaching resources were likely to be something that teachers wanted to share heavily, so we wanted users to be able to upload a file and, to avoid this simply being somewhere to share files without any meaning, attach these to a discussion. Within TalkPhysics, technically, a resource is defined as a file attached to either a topic (the start of a discussion) or a comment (the reply to a discussion).

      We needed users to categorise their resources, so other users can browse through them, just as users currently browse through the topics and comments after the log-in page. That list of “tags” is the list of possible resource categories. These need to be renamed, to distinguish them from genuine tags, which would be whatever words a user chooses to use, giving the user complete freedom. Particularly, we wanted to tie this in with something like a tagcloud, so it would be easy to see what other users have used.

      An analogy would be with iTunes – when posting a resource a user would pick a category set by our administrators, equivalent to song/film/book/etc., but beyond that users could tag by anything they choose, equivalent to jazz/classic rock/psychobilly/etc.

      Currently users cannot search using tags – we need to plan quite carefully how users will be able to search for content. Ideally, the main search would return results according to some mix of factors, including the tags, free text and relevance. Ideally, we would even give users a very quick way to rate content (like Digg!), so that is considered in the search as well.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?